Show of hands if you’ve heard of “Crypto Kiosk Fraud.” If not, here we go. 

Crypto kiosks are similar to bank ATMs, allowing people to manage legal cryptocurrency transactions, such as sending money to digital wallets. (I have no idea what that is, but bear with me.) These kiosks, also known as “crypto ATMs,” “BTMs,” or “virtual currency kiosks,” can be found in bars, convenience and grocery stores, gas stations and restaurants. Currently, there are more than 45,000 crypto ATMs nationwide. However, because crypto ATMs are largely unregulated at the state level compared to traditional banks or other money service businesses, there’s no fraud protections. This enables criminals to use crypto ATMs to steal hundreds of millions of dollars from unsuspecting Americans each year through fraudulent purchase schemes. Naturally this fraudulent activity targets older folks. 

In 2024, the FBI received nearly 1100 complaints involving crypto kiosks with reports of over $246.7 million in stolen funds. More than 85% of these thefts happened to adults over 60 years old, with the average amount stolen more than $40,000.

The scammers often impersonate government officials or businesses, usually convincing their target that in order to deal with a serious financial issue, they need to withdraw large amounts of cash and put that money into a crypto ATM. It is then transferred to a digital wallet controlled by these criminals.

“A digital wallet, also known as an electronic wallet, is a software application that stores your payment details and passwords, enabling seamless transactions on connected devices, chiefly mobile phones. By securely holding your financial data, digital wallets remove the necessity for physical wallets. You simply load your credit, debit, or bank account information into the application, allowing you to conduct purchases directly via your device without the need to carry physical cards.”

No thanks.

Anyway, cryptocurrency kiosks are not currently regulated here in New Hampshire. So, earlier this year SB 482 was passed in the State Senate. This bill is supported by NH Assoc. of Chiefs of Police, NH Atty. General’s Office, NH Legal Assistance, NH Commission on Aging and AARP (American Association of Retired People.) 

What this bill does: 
~Sets a $2,000 daily transaction limit.
~STOPS NH from being a TARGET for scammers. NH has seen hundreds of cases in recent years because there has been no limit on transactions.
~Allows victims 14 days to request a refund from the crypto ATM operator.
~Does not obstruct local control, nor is there a “safe harbor” clause.

The bill comes up for a vote in the House soon but with an added amendment by Republican Free Stater Rep. Keith Ammon. What does the amendment do? 

Weakens the bill by stripping protections.

A few examples: 
~There is no transaction limit after the “new customer” period has passed. (72 hours)
~No refunds on transactions made after “new customer” period has passed. 
~ Unlike the original bill the amendment provides safe harbor for “compliant” operators from enforcement actions from NH Atty. General’s Office.
~ Explicitly prohibits cities and towns from passing more restrictive safeguards. More taking away of local control. However, the amendment does allow operators to enact their own stricter rules.

According to the NH Atty. General’s Office these kiosk scams are becoming widespread in NH. So rather than protect their constituents, the Republican Free Staters have opted to leave the door slightly open for scammers to continue to victimize the people of NH!

More here; As scammers use kiosks to strip NH residents of their savings, lawmakers tangle over safeguards • New Hampshire Bulletin

Last week I attended an all day Democratic caucus retreat in Concord. There were many workshops to choose from; housing, child care, training in social media, energy policy and education funding. That last one I chose to attend and would like to share some of what I’ve learned here.

In New Hampshire there’s about 160,000 kids (90%) who attend public schools and we rank 9th nationally in per-pupil spending. However, we rank last in the state’s share of funding our public schools. We also rely heavily on local property taxes, creating a substantial inequality between communities. The tax rate difference is upwards of 5–10 times, resulting in differing student outcomes.

What I learned is public schools are strong, despite a fractured funding system. This underfunding by the state is what causes high property taxes which the courts have ruled unconstitutional.

These are the court decisions going back more than 30 years:
~Claremont School District v. Gov. (Claremont I) Decided: 1993 
The court held that education is a fundamental right under the NH Constitution and the state has a duty to provide it. 
~Claremont School District v. Gov. (Claremont II) Decided: 1997 
The court ruled the existing system unconstitutional, requiring the state to define an adequate education and fund it with proportional and reasonable taxes.
~ Londonderry School District v. State Decided: 1999 
Reinforced that the state must fund an adequate education with constitutional taxes, striking down reliance on local property taxes that created disparities. 
~Contoocook Valley School District v. State (ConVal) Decided: 2025 The court found the state’s base adequacy amount ($4,100 per pupil) unconstitutionally low, setting a guideline closer to $7,300+ per student. 
~Rand v. State of NH Decided: 2024 (trial court and currently under appeal) The court ruled that the statewide property tax system violates constitutional requirements for uniform taxation, especially due to varying local tax rates.

 

How did we get here? Well, the hated school vouchers haven’t helped the average property owner . . .

School vouchers (Education Freedom Account), were touted in 2021 as income limited, but in four short years have expanded to no income cap. The vast majority of this funding (> 94%) goes to students already in private/religious schools. This takes money and resources away from public schools (in violation of Articles 6 and 83 in the NH Constitution). This program is projected to cost $100 million annually!

What brought us here? Republican Free Stater legislation: 
HB 1815 reduces state responsibility (ignoring court orders) and defunds public schools.
SB 101 destabilizes districts.
HB 1121 lowers standards.
HB 675 State imposed budget caps, taking away local control.
Things that make you go Hmmm . . . In June, 2024, then gubernatorial candidate Kelly Ayotte (R-Nashua) took part in a candidate forum stating she hoped the US Supreme Court would reverse Ruoff’s decision. Claiming, “When it comes to education funding, I personally think that that Superior Court decision was wrong. I’m glad that the governor (Sununu) has appealed that to the Supreme Court.”
Now the Attorney General has moved to overturn the Claremont decision(s). Hmmm . . .

FYI, since 2016, Republican Free Staters have enacted cuts at the state level.
Business taxes have been SLASHED by $1.4 billion. 
Interest and Dividends taxes ELIMINATED $0.4 billion. 
This results in higher property taxes at the local level, which have INCREASED by $1.8 billion. 
Republican Free Staters have prioritized great deals for Apple, Amazon, Walmart and big investors over the rest of us. 

Republican Free Staters have also made sure any Democrat legislation aimed at helping property owners and school children are voted down, tabled or referred for interim study. Examples;
HB 1799: Addresses CONVAL decision
HB 1648: property tax exemption for qualifying residences 
HB 734: SWEPT reform and property tax relief  
HB 1578: transparency for public funds used in school vouchers
HB 1212: Free and reduced cost school lunches. They won’t do it! 

The ways in which our cities and towns are now impacted:
~Higher property taxes 
~Widening inequality between school districts 
~Unnecessary strains on special education and high need students 
~School budgeting is now more challenging

Apparently the Republican Free Staters have decided they are not done messing with the state Constitution! CACR 12 is a Republican sponsored Constitutional amendment. I am quoting from Andru Volinsky’s article (which is entirely linked above), “A similar amendment that originated in the House failed a few weeks ago but Speaker Packard is awarding the Free Staters a do-over. The Senate’s amendment resolution changes the NH Constitution to require a super-majority of two-thirds in the House and Senate to pass any “new tax on personal income, earned or unearned, sales or use, capital gains, inheritance, estate, or death, or any similar broad-based tax scheme….” 

This cannot stand. Should this amendment make it to our ballots in Nov., it must be heavily voted down! And while we’re at it, Free Staters need to be voted out, too.

Whatever happened to a person’s First Amendment right of “freedom of speech”? In the New Hampshire State House, it apparently takes a hike when members of the Republican “Free” Staters don’t like what is either being said or is about to be said.

On Thursday April 9th, this “silencing” took place twice. After the Session was completed for the day, members are able to make announcements to colleagues in the Chamber. Rep. Kat McGhee began to speak, “On Monday of this week I asked my committee chair if the minority could have some time at the beginning of our hearing to acknowledge the removal of one of our members on the House Science, Technology and Energy Committee. He declined, saying that he felt there was nothing left to be said. There’s an . . .” 

At that point, Republican Free Stater Rep. Joe Sweeney jumped in by making an objection to her floor speech, prompting the House Speaker to interrupt her, stopping her speech. The question “Should the member continue” was now put to the House for a roll call vote. Rep. McGhee was not allowed to continue, 181-155. 

She was silenced.

A few minutes later Rep. Tim Horrigan got up to speak. “Tuesday, April 7th was a very scary day for me, probably for all of us. It was about the scariest day I can remember since Sept. 11, 2001, because I was concerned that we might be heading towards WWIII or Armageddon and that was because of the words and actions of or president. He said a lot of very inappropriate things, especially on Easter morning and so I maybe took them, so anyway I took those seriously when I was driving to the State House on Tues. I could tell that my usual news sources NPR and MS Now were both, you can tell there are things that they’re not telling us and so I tried a different new source. So what’s happening in Iran is very . . .” 

At that point Republican Free Stater Rep. Kelley Potenza objected to the speech. Rep. Horrigan was stopped by the Speaker and another roll call vote was held for “Should the member continue.” Which of course he would not, 149-115. (A lot of members had already left by then.)

He was silenced. 

What was being said that these two members of the Free Staters didn’t want to hear about?

Rep. Horrigan was referring to Trump’s threats of genocide on Iran. Rep. McGhee was referring to the threatening manner in which the chairman of the Science, Technology and Energy Committee, Republican Free Stater Rep. Michael Vose treated Rep. Wendy Thomas. Apparently, this behavior of his isn’t limited to House Representatives. It happens to members of the public.

This is not the first time Democrats have been silenced by Republican Free Staters. On May 8th, 2025 a bill to remove the income cap for the hated school vouchers came up for a vote in the House. Before the vote, Free Stater Sweeney made the motion to curtail further debate on the bill, effectively cutting off any discussion of why this would be terrible legislation for the state. Rep. Dick Ames, waiting to speak, was denied that right.

He was silenced. 

And because of gross scheduling mismanagement this year on the part of majority leadership, more than 70 Democrat sponsored bills never even got to the House floor for debate and a vote during two marathon Session days, March 11th and 12th.

Not only were Democrat voices silenced yet again, but the entire state lost out on good legislation. 

To see the clip of both Reps. McGhee and Horrigan click https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjESoRGB3mY, then scroll to the 1:58:06 mark and then to the 2:18:44 mark.

Sick of it? Good! Be sure you vote for candidates who want to undo and reverse this Republican Free Stater damage!

And by that, I mean this current mess of higher, unsustainable property taxes, a direct cause of revenue sources repealed by a bunch of selfish, cruel, power hungry elected “officials” who have seemingly taken a perverse pleasure in hurting those who they are supposed to “represent.”

Sorry for the run on sentence . . .

Here’s a good recent example that Gov. Ayotte rushed to put her signature on, HB 1815. Brought to us by one of the most vocal advocates for voter suppression, Rep. Bob Lynn (scored a “B” with Liberty Alliance) and Free Stater Rep. Dan McGuire (“A”), this bill is another means of raising property taxes (again) while turning a blind eye to the repeated decisions of the courts on the state’s responsibility of funding an adequate education for public school students. The bill passed on March 5, 188-162. Rep. Dave Luneau, the Ranking Member on the House Education Funding Committee had this to say, "If you think your property taxes are bad now, just wait. By eliminating the state's obligation to fund public education, Governor Ayotte and Republicans have thrown students under the bus to save a dime and pass the buck onto property taxpayers. Instead of utilizing existing revenue sources to properly fund education, Republicans have cut corporate taxes by over a billion dollars over the past decade. People are struggling while large, multinational corporations use the Granite State economy to line their pockets. It is past time for Republicans to support local taxpayers and comply with the New Hampshire Constitution. Weakening our education standards helps no one.” Rand Decision Finds State Funding Deficient. A reminder that since 2015 business tax rate reductions have cost the state nearly a billion dollars in revenue! 

How did your representative vote? Click here to see.

On Tues., April 14th, the Senate will be holding a public hearing on HB 1793, the guns on college campuses bill that the House passed on Feb. 5th, 188-165. How did your representative vote? Click here to see.

To voice your online opposition to this bill click here, select the date - April 14;
select the committee - Judiciary;
select the bill - HB1793;
select who you are and then oppose the bill.

And one more call to action request for another book ban bill, this time from the Senate. The House Education Policy and Administration Committee is holding a public hearing on April 8th.  SB 434 wants to regulate public school materials. (Notice how it’s always the public schools, not the private, religious schools.) 
Click here, fill in your name, address;
select the date – April 8;
select the committee – Education Policy;
select the bill – SB 434;
select who you are and then oppose the bill.

So far, there are 138 who oppose this nonsense with only 6 in support. 

“Education is for improving the lives of others and leaving your community and world better than you found it.”

                               Marion Wright Edleman - an American activist for children’s and civil rights. She is the founder and president emerita of the Children's Defense Fund.

 

"We don't always agree, but we respect one another and work together for the common good. That's the New Hampshire way."

So said former Senator John Sununu back in Oct. when he was announcing a run for retiring Senator Jeanne Shaheen’s seat. I don’t know where he’s been during the last decade but “working together for the common good” is not what the Republican Free Staters in the New Hampshire State Senate or New Hampshire House have been doing. Perhaps he can clue them in.

How about some history. . .

The White House Effect is a documentary released in 2025 focusing on what was referred to as “global warming” back in the latter part of the 20th century. Scientists had been studying the effects of what was happening to our environment and climate and were banging the warning drums. George HW Bush was running for president, promising to be the “environmental president.” He acknowledged what was then called the “greenhouse effect”, that fossil fuels were emitting excess carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, leading to global warming. According to the documentary (a 2 min. link) Bush actually seemed interested in addressing this global issue.

Fast forward to the Bush White House where he named John H. Sununu his Chief of Staff, governor of NH at the time. Sununu served as Chief of Staff from 1989-91. During those brief few years, Sununu, who was an ally of corporate lobbyists, worked against bringing Bush on board for any climate action. In Nov. 1989, he prevented the signing of a 67-nation commitment at the Noordwijk Climate Conference to freeze carbon dioxide emissions, with a reduction of 20% by 2005. The documentary clearly shows corporations who diminished and discredited scientific evidence in order to protect their profit. Remember this from 1984, an internal Exxon document: “We can either adapt our civilization to a warmer planet or avoid the problem by sharply curtailing the use of fossil fuels.”

I guess we all know what they chose . . .

Now to the son running for the Senate. Does he feel the same way as the father when it comes to issues of climate and the environment?  Americans for Prosperity (a conservative, libertarian Koch brothers organization) has endorsed him. His record from his one earlier term should make NH voters a little wary. For example, while in the Senate, he voted 4 times against lowering prescription prices. In July 2010, Sununu joined one of the largest law and lobbying firms in Washington, DC. Akin Gump hired him as a Senior Policy Advisor and he remained until 2019. Akin Gump also represents domestic and international gas and oil leaders in their transactions. Remember the Keystone XL Pipeline? Akin Gump was hired to lobby on behalf of the Pipeline.

The documentary is about 90 mins., well worth every one of them. Check out Americans for Prosperity and research all candidates. Nov. will be here before we know it. 

On Sat., March 28th, an estimated 8-9 million people gathered on streets, town squares, state houses, all over the country to express YET AGAIN their displeasure with the many ways the current regime is destroying our democracy. From Boston to Los Angeles; from St. Paul to New York City to Palm Beach, hundreds of thousands of American citizens turned out bearing signs and feeling the camaraderie of others. 

Here in New Hampshire was no different. Thousands showed up at the State Capitol in Concord, nearly 2,000 in Keene, Wolfeboro and Walpole hosted about 850 and 300 people respectively. Hinsdale put on its first ever rally and drew a little over 30 people, while the numbers in Rindge rose to about 80. And that’s how it went on Sat., with town after town coming together in solidarity with their concerns about the future. Most expressed these concerns were for their families, what kind of country can they expect their loved ones to be living in? 

In Keene, lots of talk turned to state issues. Mostly what the Republican Free Staters have done to exponentially repeal revenue while raising property taxes. Because where is the revenue going to come from if not from the property owner (and renters) to make up for the shortfall? 

Did you know that since 2015 business tax rate reductions have cost the state between $795 million and $1.17 billion in revenue? In just ten years, NH’s state revenue has gone DOWN by nearly a BILLION dollars??!! Money that should have gone to public education, health care, or seeing to our infrastructure to give a few examples. How could this happen? And year after year . . .?

Free Staters.

They have slowly but consistently voted to repeal one source of state revenue after another while simultaneously voting to divert property tax dollars in support of their school voucher program. 

Spoiler alert: this is not sustainable.

So, while Saturday’s “No Kings” rallies were taking place in NH protesting the selfish wants of America’s wannabe mad king, we were also protesting the selfish and destructive Republican Free Staters. House Majority Leader and Free Stater Jason Osborne acknowledged the state’s protests, “Democrat activists can screech until their faces turn as blue as their hair. While they’re concerned with the mythical ‘No Kings’ movement, Republicans are focused on actual causes that matter: no income taxes, no inspection schemes, and no Democrat majorities.”

Here, I’ll fix it. “While they’re concerned with the mythical ‘No Kings’ movement, Republicans are focused on actual causes that matter only to us: no income taxes, no inspection schemes, the destruction of public schools while advocating for segregated ones, no school lunches for low-income children, no more easy access to voting, a fee for Medicaid, minimum wage will not be raised, continue to make it harder for teachers to teach, target immigrants and asylum seekers, work towards promoting fossil fuels while we repeal the solar energy tax exemption and continue to take away your local control.”

We need to turn out in Nov. so we can fix the majority in Concord.

There are more than 4,400 colleges and universities across the country that prohibit carrying guns on campus. New Hampshire is among them:
Keene State College prohibits possessing guns, ammunition and other weapons (air/BB/paintball guns, bows and knives) on campus. Violations result in disciplinary actions and confiscated weapons turned over to the Keene Police Dept. by Campus Safety. Who carry no weapons, by the way.

Plymouth State University strictly prohibits possessing or using firearms, explosives or other dangerous weapons on all university property. Violations result in disciplinary and possible legal actions.

University of NH prohibits possessing all manner of firearms and other dangerous weapons on all campuses, Concord, Durham and Manchester. Exceptions require written permission from UNH Police Chief and weapons may be stored with the UNH Police. 

Some recent data from Best Colleges:
~Since 1966, there have been 17 shootings at colleges where at least three people were killed.

~Outside of mass shootings, there have been roughly 385 instances of gunfire on college campuses since 2013, killing 111 people and injuring 266.

~Researchers have found that gun access on college campuses may increase the risk of suicide and turn aggressive incidents more deadly.

~Most college students surveyed say school shootings impact their sense of safety on campus (65%) and favor stricter campus gun policies (63%).

In NH, the overall gun death rate rose by 10% from 2014-2023. According to EveryTown for Gun Safety an average year in NH will see 140 people die by gun violence. So rather than attempt to reverse this statistic, Republican Free Staters opted to make the problem worse. And what better place to start than with state colleges and universities?

On Feb. 5 HB 1793 came before the House for a vote. There is no other legislation is ALL of the United States that is THIS extreme. Even Wyoming’s Republican Gov. Mark Gordon recently vetoed legislation that he felt went too far in its extremism. This bill not only forbids colleges and universities from prohibiting weapons on campus, it grants people the right to sue these institutions if they failed to allow Junior to have his gun with him in class or anywhere else on campus. 
To the tune of at least $10,000.

Would you feel safe sending your child to a college that allows open carry on campus? 

Online opposition to this deranged piece of legislation was 643 to 231 who supported it. The bill passed in the House anyway, 188-165. On its legislative journey it was then referred to the House Finance Committee who waived it on to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Where it waits for more action, before heading back to the House and ultimately the governor’s desk.

This is where We, the People come in. Using information and statistics from not only this article but the links included, drop an email to the Senators on the Judiciary Committee and the Governor expressing your concerns. Public input does make a difference occasionally.
Sen. Bill Gannon, chairman; William.Gannon@gc.nh.gov
Sen. Daryl Abbas, vice-chair; Daryl.Abbas@gc.nh.gov
Sen. Debra Altschiller; Debra.Altschiller@gc.nh.gov
Sen. Tara Reardon; Tara.Reardon@gc.nh.gov
Sen. Sharon Carson; Sharon.Carson@gc.nh.gov
Gov. Kelly Ayotte; GovernorAyotte@governor.nh.gov

Who sponsored this deranged, gun happy bill? Republican Free Stater Sam Farrington, who scored an A+ with Liberty Alliance and is currently a student at UNH. Why would he willingly jeopardize the rights, lives and safety of fellow students, professors and staff members just because he wants to have a gun on campus? 

Article 1; Section 8 of the United States Constitution states (in part): The Congress shall have Power To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

As we can see from this one small example from our Constitution the current regime has ignored any and all manner of it. From blowing up “alleged” Venezuelan drug dealers/smugglers in open waters to starting an unprovoked war in Iran, the current regime has thumbed its collective nose at the very document that has shaped our nation’s existence to this day. 

While there’s so many aberrations resulting from government run by morons, the focus in this article is oil and the cost thereof. Since the start of this illegal war, (not an "excursion") the cost of putting gas in your vehicle has jumped ever higher in a short amount of time. Half the nation's 50 states have seen average gas prices spike by over $1 a gallon in the last month. Examples:
Colorado +$1.31/gallon
New Mexico +$1.31
Arizona +$1.27
Illinois +$1.25
California +$1.20
Utah +$1.19
Kentucky +$1.18
Indiana +$1.13
Wisconsin +$1.13
Idaho +$1.13

The price of diesel surged over $2 a gallon in 30 days. Examples:
Tucson +$2.21/gal
Phoenix +$2.10
Orange County, CA +$2.06
McAllen, TX +$2.01
Madera, CA +$2.00
Napa, CA +$2.00
The Villages, FL +$2.00
Prescott, AZ +$1.99
Sarasota, FL +$1.98

Here in New Hampshire, we’re averaging about $3.26 a gallon, an increase of nearly 50 cents. The state has also experienced a higher  increase in extreme weather since 2011. Our utility bills have risen nearly 12% in the past year. What’s being done to address this? Address anything even related to clean energy, environment, climate?

Well, not much with Republican Free Staters in the majority.

Last year they voted against establishing a commission to determine the financial costs of climate change. They rejected all offshore wind energy projects, while declaring “the development of advanced nuclear energy technology to be in the best interest of NH.” They voted down a bill for electric vehicle funding for charging stations. FYI, this was a local control bill which would have allowed towns to establish a revolving fund for building these stations and marking dedicated spaces for these charging spaces.

This year they repealed the solar energy tax exemption. Voters in 153 NH cities and towns had previously voted they wanted to use this tax exemption, which is an incentive to “go solar.” That is NOT what the Republican Free Staters or Americans for Prosperity want! So they tabled the bill, 187-157. 

There is bi-partisan legislation coming before the House on Thursday. HB 1602 will establish a statewide battery stewardship program requiring the safe collection, recycling, and management of covered batteries and battery-containing products, administered through producer participation and oversight by the Dept. of Environmental Services. It will cost the state nothing. NH Fire Chiefs testified to millions of dollars in fire damage at transfer stations from batteries and support this bill. Naturally the Republican Free Staters/Liberty Alliance members on the House Finance Committee want to “kill the bill.” They think of it as a hidden sales tax. Which it isn’t. It’s protecting the environment.

Another bi-partisan bill was recently vetoed by the governor who says it would create a sales tax. HB 451called for paint manufacturers to participate in a stewardship program, which manages end-of-life paint in an “environmentally sound” way while educating people about the program. This program would be similar to PaintCare programs in 12 other states and the District of Columbia. PaintCare is funded by a fee on each container of architectural paint sold in a PaintCare state as follows: Retailers — PaintCare. This fee pays for all aspects of operating the paint stewardship program. The PaintCare fee is not a tax, nor does it go to the state. The PaintCare fee is not a deposit, customers don’t get it back when dropping off paint. It goes to support a program whose goal is to protect the environment.

But not in New Hampshire . . .

We’re still stuck with a majority party whose focus has been on  elevating school vouchers at property owner expense, destroying public schools, getting rid of life saving vaccines, eroding local control, needlessly attacking not just immigrants but the transgender community, making it harder to vote for just about everyone, proposing their cruelty with bills calling for hard labor and four (YES, four!) death penalty bills, banning books in schools and libraries that THEY don’t like, attacking free speech and turning just about everything a teacher does or doesn’t do into a punishable violation!  Cruel and mean-spirited.

Sick of it? Then do something about it and vote in Nov.!

Actor Robert DeNiro, "The original No Kings protest was 250 years ago. Americans decided they didn't want to live under the rule of King George III... Now we have a would-be king who wants to take it (democracy) away.” 

The first nationwide "No Kings" protests took place on June 14, 2025, organized to protest the second regime (and birthday) of Donald Trump, a wanna-be king, with more than five million protesters from all 50 states in attendance. The second nationwide “No Kings” protests were held on Oct. 18, 2025, with nearly seven million people protesting. Both protests were some of the biggest single-day protests held in US history. While these protests occurred mostly in the United States, “No Kings” rallies took place around the world going by “No Tyrants” or “No Dictators.” 

On Sat. March 28, there will be a third nationwide protest where we proclaim yet again, that America has No Kings! Find one close to you and join us in New Hampshire:

• Concord – 12:00-4:00, State House, 107North Main St.
• Hancock – 10:00-12:00, Moosebrook Lane
• Jaffrey - 1:00-3:00, Rtes. 124 & 202 (former Rite-Aid)
• Keene – 12:00-2:00, Central Square
• Peterborough – 1:00-2:30, Rtes. 101 & 202
• Rindge – 10:00- 12:00, Rtes. 119 & 202
• Swanzey – 12:00-2:00, Simeneau Lane
• Walpole – 3:30-5:00, 8 Huntington Lane

Vermont:

• Bellows Falls – 1:00-2:30, 17 Depot St.
• Brattleboro – 10:00, Preston Lot, Flat St.

The one thing the government fears is the day we stand together. Come stand with us!

A “Constitutional Amendment Concurrent Resolution” (CACR) is a proposed constitutional change requiring a 3/5 majority vote in both the House of Representatives and Senate. If passed in both chambers, the CACR ends up on the ballot of the state’s voters at the next general election. But before being ratified into the state Constitution, it must receive a 2/3 majority from the voters. 

So far, a lot of these terrible CACR’s are not getting on the ballot in Nov. due to a lack of 3/5 majority. Here’s some examples brought to us by Republican Free Staters:
CACR 9 is sponsored by perennial voter suppression advocate Rep. Bob Lynn, but this one will raise the mandatory retirement age for NH judges from 70 to 75. Currently, the law reads: “No person shall hold the office of judge of any court, or judge of probate, or sheriff of any county, after he has attained the age of seventy years.” This was tried in 2024 and failed. Lynn, a former judge, wants to have the words, “judge of any court, or judge of probate, or” removed and replaced with “No person shall hold the office of judge of any court after the person has attained the age of seventy-five years.” Lynn scored a “B” on last years Liberty Alliance scorecard, which should be a red flag for voters. The amendment failed to gather the 3/5 majority; 185 no, 136 yes.

I need to correct what I had previously written about CACR 14, requiring candidates for the office of governor, state senator and representative be citizens of the United States. The state already has that requirement under RSA 655:1. An effort in redundancy failed to get 3/5 majority, 182 yes, 157 no.

CACR 15 is just another gun rights bill disguised as “the constitutional right to hunt, fish, and harvest game and fish, subject to restrictions existing in law” for NH citizens. There is no need for this bill because every citizen with a hunting license already has the right to hunt, fish and trap. If this had passed, a person accused of domestic violence could argue if courts try to remove their guns, “my rifle is my hunting rifle and I have a constitutional right to hunt. You can’t take my gun.” Additionally, if a person is a convicted felon or convicted of domestic violence, this amendment can be used by that person to have a gun returned. This amendment failed to get the 3/5 majority, 199 yes, 128 no.

CACR 21 is another effort in redundancy. This requires “only legal residents who are at least 18 years of age or older who reside in the place they claim as domicile shall be eligible voters.” Duh. Here it is already in RSA 654:7. 184 yes, 146 no, failed to get 3/5 majority.

Who knew we parents didn’t have any rights pertaining to the education of our kids? All these years being blissfully ignorant. . . Anyway, parents and guardians already have rights in the educating of their children. Republican Free Staters brought forth CACR 24, an amendment that could be used against public education and public schools. And we all know how they feel about public education. Luckily, it failed to get 3/5 majority, 181 yes, 156 no. 

Here’s one brought by Democrats, seeking to have “the right to marry as a fundamental civil right and that the state shall protect the right of every individual, regardless of sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, or race, to marry and to have their marriage legally recognized.” CACR 25 was killed (ITL) in the House, 176-162. 

Here’s a couple more relating to taxes that didn’t make the cut; CACR 10 and CACR 18. A huge effort by Republican Free Staters this Session to mess with the state’s Constitution. 

This one was a Democrat effort for Medicare for All. HCR 12 (House Concurrent Resolution) called upon “the federal delegation from NH to support Medicare for All, a universal health insurance program that guarantees all people the health care they need.” Not caring about any fellow human beings in the least, the resolution failed, 180-151.

Oh, and one more bill that was effectively killed (ITL) was HB 1171, my attempt to protect apartment tenants (seniors) who have had their Social Security payments unexpectantly interrupted, 186-155. Maybe next time . . .

So, the good news is that all these unnecessary and terrible constitutional amendments will not be on our ballots in Nov. A reminder to know who you vote for. Vet your candidates carefully. Government power comes from We, the People. It should work for all of us.