Now we have the Senate’s version of book banning in public schools. SB 434 will “require local school districts to adopt and publicly post policies describing materials authorized for use by students in the district and outlining procedures to address complaints alleging that material is harmful or age-inappropriate for use in the district's schools.” Brought to us by nearly a dozen Republican Senators and four representatives, one who would like to bring segregated schools to New Hampshire, this bill would allow one parent (or guardian) with a complaint about any particular book, have it removed.

One parent (or guardian) gets to decide for everyone else’s children. Like it or not . . .

This bill would mandate every school district in the state to design a complaint system for “materials" that certain parents don't like. Because of the use of the word “materials,” this could also mean artwork, classroom materials, health curriculum, plays, textbooks, and any visual or printed content in a school. There is no definition for the vague terms like “age-inappropriate” or “otherwise offensive”, which leaves school districts ripe for abuse. 

How about flags? Could that be considered “materials”? HB 1132, a Republican Free Stater bill, passed the House in March and is now making its way through the State Senate. The bill will prohibit the display of “certain” flags in public schools and public charter schools and authorizes the state board of education to issue monetary penalties for a third or subsequent violation of the act, not to exceed $1,000 per violation.

SB 434 will not only add extra burdens to district administrations already struggling with retaining staff and rising costs, but will also take away more local control. This bill adds the unnecessary burden of possible lawsuits against school districts who are already struggling to fund their schools. 

Last year, a similar bill was passed but vetoed by the governor. HB 324 (where we were all treated to a reading of porn on the chamber floor), the governor noted there is already a law (RSA 186:11:IX-c) requiring school districts to adopt a policy allowing exceptions to certain class materials if a parent, notified two weeks in advance, finds it objectionable. This law already requires for different materials mutually agreed upon by the parent and school district. So why the need for this year’s proposed book banning Senate bill? 

There isn’t any.

SB 434 will be coming up before the full House for a vote in a few weeks. Please take a moment to contact your representative urging them to vote NO on this latest attempt at banning books. 

And this, being a very important election year, if you need to confirm that you are STILL currently on your town’s voter checklist click here to verify.

Democracy dies when good people stay silent! This is not the time to invoke our right to remain silent!

On Thurs., April 23rd, the House heard debate on the bill that had been on everyone’s minds, SB 101 or “open enrollment.” This was a terrible Republican Free Stater bill that would have allowed parents to enroll their child(ren) in any public school anywhere in the state. 

First, the potential bad results:
~Taxpayers would be responsible for the majority of costs to “receiving” schools
~Hurts poor, smaller districts
~More chipping away of local control (is there any still left?)
~Increases problems for accessibility, athletics, district budgeting, funding, special education, student capacity, and transportation

Now the potential good results:

Online testimony registered 2,174 people who opposed this latest attempt to destroy public schools, with only 75 in support. An amendment by Republican Free Staters Reps. Kristin Noble and Katy Peternel “directs the governing body of each school district to establish an open enrollment policy to allow pupils to transfer among schools within the district and from another district in the state. Each school would be required to provide notice of its capacity to accept open enrollment pupils and would require selection by lottery in the event applications exceed capacity. The bill also establishes a funding formula for payments by the department of education from the education trust fund for open enrollment pupils.”

The amendment passed by roll call vote, 182Y-172N. Ten votes! (Never think your singular vote doesn’t matter much. Every. Vote Counts!)

The next amendment sponsored by Democrats sought to establish a commission to study public school open enrollment. Rep. Peter Petrigno spoke of how his town, Milford and about 100 other towns recently voted to put limits on “open enrollment”. He worried that passing this bill would override the will of the people. Rep. Hope Damon concurred that yes, this is the way the bill is written up, to mandate the towns to accept open enrollment, overriding local control. Naturally, that second amendment failed, 184N-169Y. 

When the bill finally came up for a vote, it failed, by 16 votes! 184N-168Y. Despite thousands of people registering their online opposition to this bill and about 100 towns basically voting to not be a part of this, Republican Free Staters thought they could ram it down the state’s throat anyway. To see how your representative voted on this terrible but important bill, click here.

Almost immediately Republican Free Stater Rep. Joe Sweeney made a motion to table the bill, which did pass, 320Y-32N. So, it could still rear its ugly head and make another appearance. Stay vigilant!

SB 482 was the bill to protect consumers from being scammed through crypto kiosks. An amendment, added by Republican Free Stater Rep. Keith Ammon, would weaken those consumer protections and thus failed, 220N-135Y. The House then went to a roll call for the original bill, which passed, 214Y-140N. There will now be some fraud protections for consumers. To see how your representative voted on this important bill, click here.To listen to some of the floor speeches, click here. Scroll to the 24:18 mark for a few of the floor speeches.

But it now seems as if SB 482 might be revived. Rep. Jennifer Rhodes, R-Winchester, (scores B+ with Liberty Alliance) has “served notice of reconsideration” for this bill. The House will vote on this at the next Session, May 7th, as the majority party probably wants to overturn it. Again, let’s stay vigilant.

At least the public schools will now have trauma kits placed in them. The bipartisan SB 429 passed by a voice vote!

Here we are. Set to celebrate the 250th anniversary of our country (such as it was, all those years ago.) 

Did you know New Hampshire was the first state to adopt its own constitution and form its own government? In 1776, months before the Declaration of Independence was signed by the Continental Congress, the town of Exeter was declaring its right to self-govern. This occurred on Jan. 4th, thus laying the groundwork for other states to adopt their own constitutions while showing colonial determination to break away from British rule.

In the meantime, as one of the original thirteen colonies, NH provided troops and resources to the Continental Army, supporting and becoming involved in the Patriot cause throughout the Revolutionary War. 

But let’s back up a bit . . .

On Dec. 13, 1774, (four months before his famous “midnight ride” in April, 1775) Paul Revere made a warning ride to NH locals that the fort in New Castle was expecting British troops from Boston. The next day, the only battle to be fought in NH was at Fort William and Mary, (now Fort Constitution) where the colonists seized large quantities of cannons, gunpowder, and small arms. 

On May 22, 1775, the NH Provincial Congress voted to raise a volunteer force to join the patriot army at Boston, organizing three regiments for the Continental Army. Militia units from NH fought at the Battle of Bunker Hill, Battle of Bennington, Saratoga Campaign and the Battle of Rhode Island. 

On Aug. 2, 1776, three NH delegates, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton, and Josiah Bartlett, signed the Declaration of Independence, marking the state's commitment to the revolutionary cause. This act reinforced the state's role in the founding of the United States.

While New Hampshire’s Constitution of 1776 was the first state constitution in America, it remained in effect throughout the Revolutionary War, becoming a model for the other colonies. Then in 1784, a more permanent constitution and a Bill of Rights, replaced it.

Today, visitors can explore historical sites in NH commemorating these events, including the American Independence Museum in Exeter, which houses many artifacts.

Visit NH | A Timeline Tour of New Hampshire

Visit NH 250th Anniversary | Visit NH 250th Anniversary

Two hundred and fifty years ago, NH joined in the battle for freedom from British rule. Today the state is in a battle for freedom from Free Stater rule. A bill targeting freedom of speech in public schools only, passed the House in March and is now making its way through the State Senate. HB 1132 will prohibit the display of “certain” flags in public schools and public charter schools. The bill also authorizes the state board of education to issue monetary penalties for a third or subsequent violation of the act, not to exceed $1,000 per violation.

What can you do? Email your state senator and tell them to oppose this effort to ban nearly all flags and banners in public schools. 

Democracy dies when good people stay silent. Then and now.

Show of hands if you’ve heard of “Crypto Kiosk Fraud.” If not, here we go. 

Crypto kiosks are similar to bank ATMs, allowing people to manage legal cryptocurrency transactions, such as sending money to digital wallets. (I have no idea what that is, but bear with me.) These kiosks, also known as “crypto ATMs,” “BTMs,” or “virtual currency kiosks,” can be found in bars, convenience and grocery stores, gas stations and restaurants. Currently, there are more than 45,000 crypto ATMs nationwide. However, because crypto ATMs are largely unregulated at the state level compared to traditional banks or other money service businesses, there’s no fraud protections. This enables criminals to use crypto ATMs to steal hundreds of millions of dollars from unsuspecting Americans each year through fraudulent purchase schemes. Naturally this fraudulent activity targets older folks. 

In 2024, the FBI received nearly 1100 complaints involving crypto kiosks with reports of over $246.7 million in stolen funds. More than 85% of these thefts happened to adults over 60 years old, with the average amount stolen more than $40,000.

The scammers often impersonate government officials or businesses, usually convincing their target that in order to deal with a serious financial issue, they need to withdraw large amounts of cash and put that money into a crypto ATM. It is then transferred to a digital wallet controlled by these criminals.

“A digital wallet, also known as an electronic wallet, is a software application that stores your payment details and passwords, enabling seamless transactions on connected devices, chiefly mobile phones. By securely holding your financial data, digital wallets remove the necessity for physical wallets. You simply load your credit, debit, or bank account information into the application, allowing you to conduct purchases directly via your device without the need to carry physical cards.”

No thanks.

Anyway, cryptocurrency kiosks are not currently regulated here in New Hampshire. So, earlier this year SB 482 was passed in the State Senate. This bill is supported by NH Assoc. of Chiefs of Police, NH Atty. General’s Office, NH Legal Assistance, NH Commission on Aging and AARP (American Association of Retired People.) 

What this bill does: 
~Sets a $2,000 daily transaction limit.
~STOPS NH from being a TARGET for scammers. NH has seen hundreds of cases in recent years because there has been no limit on transactions.
~Allows victims 14 days to request a refund from the crypto ATM operator.
~Does not obstruct local control, nor is there a “safe harbor” clause.

The bill comes up for a vote in the House soon but with an added amendment by Republican Free Stater Rep. Keith Ammon. What does the amendment do? 

Weakens the bill by stripping protections.

A few examples: 
~There is no transaction limit after the “new customer” period has passed. (72 hours)
~No refunds on transactions made after “new customer” period has passed. 
~ Unlike the original bill the amendment provides safe harbor for “compliant” operators from enforcement actions from NH Atty. General’s Office.
~ Explicitly prohibits cities and towns from passing more restrictive safeguards. More taking away of local control. However, the amendment does allow operators to enact their own stricter rules.

According to the NH Atty. General’s Office these kiosk scams are becoming widespread in NH. So rather than protect their constituents, the Republican Free Staters have opted to leave the door slightly open for scammers to continue to victimize the people of NH!

More here; As scammers use kiosks to strip NH residents of their savings, lawmakers tangle over safeguards • New Hampshire Bulletin

Last week I attended an all day Democratic caucus retreat in Concord. There were many workshops to choose from; housing, child care, training in social media, energy policy and education funding. That last one I chose to attend and would like to share some of what I’ve learned here.

In New Hampshire there’s about 160,000 kids (90%) who attend public schools and we rank 9th nationally in per-pupil spending. However, we rank last in the state’s share of funding our public schools. We also rely heavily on local property taxes, creating a substantial inequality between communities. The tax rate difference is upwards of 5–10 times, resulting in differing student outcomes.

What I learned is public schools are strong, despite a fractured funding system. This underfunding by the state is what causes high property taxes which the courts have ruled unconstitutional.

These are the court decisions going back more than 30 years:
~Claremont School District v. Gov. (Claremont I) Decided: 1993 
The court held that education is a fundamental right under the NH Constitution and the state has a duty to provide it. 
~Claremont School District v. Gov. (Claremont II) Decided: 1997 
The court ruled the existing system unconstitutional, requiring the state to define an adequate education and fund it with proportional and reasonable taxes.
~ Londonderry School District v. State Decided: 1999 
Reinforced that the state must fund an adequate education with constitutional taxes, striking down reliance on local property taxes that created disparities. 
~Contoocook Valley School District v. State (ConVal) Decided: 2025 The court found the state’s base adequacy amount ($4,100 per pupil) unconstitutionally low, setting a guideline closer to $7,300+ per student. 
~Rand v. State of NH Decided: 2024 (trial court and currently under appeal) The court ruled that the statewide property tax system violates constitutional requirements for uniform taxation, especially due to varying local tax rates.

 

How did we get here? Well, the hated school vouchers haven’t helped the average property owner . . .

School vouchers (Education Freedom Account), were touted in 2021 as income limited, but in four short years have expanded to no income cap. The vast majority of this funding (> 94%) goes to students already in private/religious schools. This takes money and resources away from public schools (in violation of Articles 6 and 83 in the NH Constitution). This program is projected to cost $100 million annually!

What brought us here? Republican Free Stater legislation: 
HB 1815 reduces state responsibility (ignoring court orders) and defunds public schools.
SB 101 destabilizes districts.
HB 1121 lowers standards.
HB 675 State imposed budget caps, taking away local control.
Things that make you go Hmmm . . . In June, 2024, then gubernatorial candidate Kelly Ayotte (R-Nashua) took part in a candidate forum stating she hoped the US Supreme Court would reverse Ruoff’s decision. Claiming, “When it comes to education funding, I personally think that that Superior Court decision was wrong. I’m glad that the governor (Sununu) has appealed that to the Supreme Court.”
Now the Attorney General has moved to overturn the Claremont decision(s). Hmmm . . .

FYI, since 2016, Republican Free Staters have enacted cuts at the state level.
Business taxes have been SLASHED by $1.4 billion. 
Interest and Dividends taxes ELIMINATED $0.4 billion. 
This results in higher property taxes at the local level, which have INCREASED by $1.8 billion. 
Republican Free Staters have prioritized great deals for Apple, Amazon, Walmart and big investors over the rest of us. 

Republican Free Staters have also made sure any Democrat legislation aimed at helping property owners and school children are voted down, tabled or referred for interim study. Examples;
HB 1799: Addresses CONVAL decision
HB 1648: property tax exemption for qualifying residences 
HB 734: SWEPT reform and property tax relief  
HB 1578: transparency for public funds used in school vouchers
HB 1212: Free and reduced cost school lunches. They won’t do it! 

The ways in which our cities and towns are now impacted:
~Higher property taxes 
~Widening inequality between school districts 
~Unnecessary strains on special education and high need students 
~School budgeting is now more challenging

Apparently the Republican Free Staters have decided they are not done messing with the state Constitution! CACR 12 is a Republican sponsored Constitutional amendment. I am quoting from Andru Volinsky’s article (which is entirely linked above), “A similar amendment that originated in the House failed a few weeks ago but Speaker Packard is awarding the Free Staters a do-over. The Senate’s amendment resolution changes the NH Constitution to require a super-majority of two-thirds in the House and Senate to pass any “new tax on personal income, earned or unearned, sales or use, capital gains, inheritance, estate, or death, or any similar broad-based tax scheme….” 

This cannot stand. Should this amendment make it to our ballots in Nov., it must be heavily voted down! And while we’re at it, Free Staters need to be voted out, too.

Whatever happened to a person’s First Amendment right of “freedom of speech”? In the New Hampshire State House, it apparently takes a hike when members of the Republican “Free” Staters don’t like what is either being said or is about to be said.

On Thursday April 9th, this “silencing” took place twice. After the Session was completed for the day, members are able to make announcements to colleagues in the Chamber. Rep. Kat McGhee began to speak, “On Monday of this week I asked my committee chair if the minority could have some time at the beginning of our hearing to acknowledge the removal of one of our members on the House Science, Technology and Energy Committee. He declined, saying that he felt there was nothing left to be said. There’s an . . .” 

At that point, Republican Free Stater Rep. Joe Sweeney jumped in by making an objection to her floor speech, prompting the House Speaker to interrupt her, stopping her speech. The question “Should the member continue” was now put to the House for a roll call vote. Rep. McGhee was not allowed to continue, 181-155. 

She was silenced.

A few minutes later Rep. Tim Horrigan got up to speak. “Tuesday, April 7th was a very scary day for me, probably for all of us. It was about the scariest day I can remember since Sept. 11, 2001, because I was concerned that we might be heading towards WWIII or Armageddon and that was because of the words and actions of or president. He said a lot of very inappropriate things, especially on Easter morning and so I maybe took them, so anyway I took those seriously when I was driving to the State House on Tues. I could tell that my usual news sources NPR and MS Now were both, you can tell there are things that they’re not telling us and so I tried a different new source. So what’s happening in Iran is very . . .” 

At that point Republican Free Stater Rep. Kelley Potenza objected to the speech. Rep. Horrigan was stopped by the Speaker and another roll call vote was held for “Should the member continue.” Which of course he would not, 149-115. (A lot of members had already left by then.)

He was silenced. 

What was being said that these two members of the Free Staters didn’t want to hear about?

Rep. Horrigan was referring to Trump’s threats of genocide on Iran. Rep. McGhee was referring to the threatening manner in which the chairman of the Science, Technology and Energy Committee, Republican Free Stater Rep. Michael Vose treated Rep. Wendy Thomas. Apparently, this behavior of his isn’t limited to House Representatives. It happens to members of the public.

This is not the first time Democrats have been silenced by Republican Free Staters. On May 8th, 2025 a bill to remove the income cap for the hated school vouchers came up for a vote in the House. Before the vote, Free Stater Sweeney made the motion to curtail further debate on the bill, effectively cutting off any discussion of why this would be terrible legislation for the state. Rep. Dick Ames, waiting to speak, was denied that right.

He was silenced. 

And because of gross scheduling mismanagement this year on the part of majority leadership, more than 70 Democrat sponsored bills never even got to the House floor for debate and a vote during two marathon Session days, March 11th and 12th.

Not only were Democrat voices silenced yet again, but the entire state lost out on good legislation. 

To see the clip of both Reps. McGhee and Horrigan click https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjESoRGB3mY, then scroll to the 1:58:06 mark and then to the 2:18:44 mark.

Sick of it? Good! Be sure you vote for candidates who want to undo and reverse this Republican Free Stater damage!

And by that, I mean this current mess of higher, unsustainable property taxes, a direct cause of revenue sources repealed by a bunch of selfish, cruel, power hungry elected “officials” who have seemingly taken a perverse pleasure in hurting those who they are supposed to “represent.”

Sorry for the run on sentence . . .

Here’s a good recent example that Gov. Ayotte rushed to put her signature on, HB 1815. Brought to us by one of the most vocal advocates for voter suppression, Rep. Bob Lynn (scored a “B” with Liberty Alliance) and Free Stater Rep. Dan McGuire (“A”), this bill is another means of raising property taxes (again) while turning a blind eye to the repeated decisions of the courts on the state’s responsibility of funding an adequate education for public school students. The bill passed on March 5, 188-162. Rep. Dave Luneau, the Ranking Member on the House Education Funding Committee had this to say, "If you think your property taxes are bad now, just wait. By eliminating the state's obligation to fund public education, Governor Ayotte and Republicans have thrown students under the bus to save a dime and pass the buck onto property taxpayers. Instead of utilizing existing revenue sources to properly fund education, Republicans have cut corporate taxes by over a billion dollars over the past decade. People are struggling while large, multinational corporations use the Granite State economy to line their pockets. It is past time for Republicans to support local taxpayers and comply with the New Hampshire Constitution. Weakening our education standards helps no one.” Rand Decision Finds State Funding Deficient. A reminder that since 2015 business tax rate reductions have cost the state nearly a billion dollars in revenue! 

How did your representative vote? Click here to see.

On Tues., April 14th, the Senate will be holding a public hearing on HB 1793, the guns on college campuses bill that the House passed on Feb. 5th, 188-165. How did your representative vote? Click here to see.

To voice your online opposition to this bill click here, select the date - April 14;
select the committee - Judiciary;
select the bill - HB1793;
select who you are and then oppose the bill.

And one more call to action request for another book ban bill, this time from the Senate. The House Education Policy and Administration Committee is holding a public hearing on April 8th.  SB 434 wants to regulate public school materials. (Notice how it’s always the public schools, not the private, religious schools.) 
Click here, fill in your name, address;
select the date – April 8;
select the committee – Education Policy;
select the bill – SB 434;
select who you are and then oppose the bill.

So far, there are 138 who oppose this nonsense with only 6 in support. 

“Education is for improving the lives of others and leaving your community and world better than you found it.”

                               Marion Wright Edleman - an American activist for children’s and civil rights. She is the founder and president emerita of the Children's Defense Fund.

 

"We don't always agree, but we respect one another and work together for the common good. That's the New Hampshire way."

So said former Senator John Sununu back in Oct. when he was announcing a run for retiring Senator Jeanne Shaheen’s seat. I don’t know where he’s been during the last decade but “working together for the common good” is not what the Republican Free Staters in the New Hampshire State Senate or New Hampshire House have been doing. Perhaps he can clue them in.

How about some history. . .

The White House Effect is a documentary released in 2025 focusing on what was referred to as “global warming” back in the latter part of the 20th century. Scientists had been studying the effects of what was happening to our environment and climate and were banging the warning drums. George HW Bush was running for president, promising to be the “environmental president.” He acknowledged what was then called the “greenhouse effect”, that fossil fuels were emitting excess carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, leading to global warming. According to the documentary (a 2 min. link) Bush actually seemed interested in addressing this global issue.

Fast forward to the Bush White House where he named John H. Sununu his Chief of Staff, governor of NH at the time. Sununu served as Chief of Staff from 1989-91. During those brief few years, Sununu, who was an ally of corporate lobbyists, worked against bringing Bush on board for any climate action. In Nov. 1989, he prevented the signing of a 67-nation commitment at the Noordwijk Climate Conference to freeze carbon dioxide emissions, with a reduction of 20% by 2005. The documentary clearly shows corporations who diminished and discredited scientific evidence in order to protect their profit. Remember this from 1984, an internal Exxon document: “We can either adapt our civilization to a warmer planet or avoid the problem by sharply curtailing the use of fossil fuels.”

I guess we all know what they chose . . .

Now to the son running for the Senate. Does he feel the same way as the father when it comes to issues of climate and the environment?  Americans for Prosperity (a conservative, libertarian Koch brothers organization) has endorsed him. His record from his one earlier term should make NH voters a little wary. For example, while in the Senate, he voted 4 times against lowering prescription prices. In July 2010, Sununu joined one of the largest law and lobbying firms in Washington, DC. Akin Gump hired him as a Senior Policy Advisor and he remained until 2019. Akin Gump also represents domestic and international gas and oil leaders in their transactions. Remember the Keystone XL Pipeline? Akin Gump was hired to lobby on behalf of the Pipeline.

The documentary is about 90 mins., well worth every one of them. Check out Americans for Prosperity and research all candidates. Nov. will be here before we know it. 

On Sat., March 28th, an estimated 8-9 million people gathered on streets, town squares, state houses, all over the country to express YET AGAIN their displeasure with the many ways the current regime is destroying our democracy. From Boston to Los Angeles; from St. Paul to New York City to Palm Beach, hundreds of thousands of American citizens turned out bearing signs and feeling the camaraderie of others. 

Here in New Hampshire was no different. Thousands showed up at the State Capitol in Concord, nearly 2,000 in Keene, Wolfeboro and Walpole hosted about 850 and 300 people respectively. Hinsdale put on its first ever rally and drew a little over 30 people, while the numbers in Rindge rose to about 80. And that’s how it went on Sat., with town after town coming together in solidarity with their concerns about the future. Most expressed these concerns were for their families, what kind of country can they expect their loved ones to be living in? 

In Keene, lots of talk turned to state issues. Mostly what the Republican Free Staters have done to exponentially repeal revenue while raising property taxes. Because where is the revenue going to come from if not from the property owner (and renters) to make up for the shortfall? 

Did you know that since 2015 business tax rate reductions have cost the state between $795 million and $1.17 billion in revenue? In just ten years, NH’s state revenue has gone DOWN by nearly a BILLION dollars??!! Money that should have gone to public education, health care, or seeing to our infrastructure to give a few examples. How could this happen? And year after year . . .?

Free Staters.

They have slowly but consistently voted to repeal one source of state revenue after another while simultaneously voting to divert property tax dollars in support of their school voucher program. 

Spoiler alert: this is not sustainable.

So, while Saturday’s “No Kings” rallies were taking place in NH protesting the selfish wants of America’s wannabe mad king, we were also protesting the selfish and destructive Republican Free Staters. House Majority Leader and Free Stater Jason Osborne acknowledged the state’s protests, “Democrat activists can screech until their faces turn as blue as their hair. While they’re concerned with the mythical ‘No Kings’ movement, Republicans are focused on actual causes that matter: no income taxes, no inspection schemes, and no Democrat majorities.”

Here, I’ll fix it. “While they’re concerned with the mythical ‘No Kings’ movement, Republicans are focused on actual causes that matter only to us: no income taxes, no inspection schemes, the destruction of public schools while advocating for segregated ones, no school lunches for low-income children, no more easy access to voting, a fee for Medicaid, minimum wage will not be raised, continue to make it harder for teachers to teach, target immigrants and asylum seekers, work towards promoting fossil fuels while we repeal the solar energy tax exemption and continue to take away your local control.”

We need to turn out in Nov. so we can fix the majority in Concord.

There are more than 4,400 colleges and universities across the country that prohibit carrying guns on campus. New Hampshire is among them:
Keene State College prohibits possessing guns, ammunition and other weapons (air/BB/paintball guns, bows and knives) on campus. Violations result in disciplinary actions and confiscated weapons turned over to the Keene Police Dept. by Campus Safety. Who carry no weapons, by the way.

Plymouth State University strictly prohibits possessing or using firearms, explosives or other dangerous weapons on all university property. Violations result in disciplinary and possible legal actions.

University of NH prohibits possessing all manner of firearms and other dangerous weapons on all campuses, Concord, Durham and Manchester. Exceptions require written permission from UNH Police Chief and weapons may be stored with the UNH Police. 

Some recent data from Best Colleges:
~Since 1966, there have been 17 shootings at colleges where at least three people were killed.

~Outside of mass shootings, there have been roughly 385 instances of gunfire on college campuses since 2013, killing 111 people and injuring 266.

~Researchers have found that gun access on college campuses may increase the risk of suicide and turn aggressive incidents more deadly.

~Most college students surveyed say school shootings impact their sense of safety on campus (65%) and favor stricter campus gun policies (63%).

In NH, the overall gun death rate rose by 10% from 2014-2023. According to EveryTown for Gun Safety an average year in NH will see 140 people die by gun violence. So rather than attempt to reverse this statistic, Republican Free Staters opted to make the problem worse. And what better place to start than with state colleges and universities?

On Feb. 5 HB 1793 came before the House for a vote. There is no other legislation is ALL of the United States that is THIS extreme. Even Wyoming’s Republican Gov. Mark Gordon recently vetoed legislation that he felt went too far in its extremism. This bill not only forbids colleges and universities from prohibiting weapons on campus, it grants people the right to sue these institutions if they failed to allow Junior to have his gun with him in class or anywhere else on campus. 
To the tune of at least $10,000.

Would you feel safe sending your child to a college that allows open carry on campus? 

Online opposition to this deranged piece of legislation was 643 to 231 who supported it. The bill passed in the House anyway, 188-165. On its legislative journey it was then referred to the House Finance Committee who waived it on to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Where it waits for more action, before heading back to the House and ultimately the governor’s desk.

This is where We, the People come in. Using information and statistics from not only this article but the links included, drop an email to the Senators on the Judiciary Committee and the Governor expressing your concerns. Public input does make a difference occasionally.
Sen. Bill Gannon, chairman; William.Gannon@gc.nh.gov
Sen. Daryl Abbas, vice-chair; Daryl.Abbas@gc.nh.gov
Sen. Debra Altschiller; Debra.Altschiller@gc.nh.gov
Sen. Tara Reardon; Tara.Reardon@gc.nh.gov
Sen. Sharon Carson; Sharon.Carson@gc.nh.gov
Gov. Kelly Ayotte; GovernorAyotte@governor.nh.gov

Who sponsored this deranged, gun happy bill? Republican Free Stater Sam Farrington, who scored an A+ with Liberty Alliance and is currently a student at UNH. Why would he willingly jeopardize the rights, lives and safety of fellow students, professors and staff members just because he wants to have a gun on campus?